<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Secureserver Rejecting the OTR Digest</title>
	<link>http://blogs.oldradio.net/archives/2009/06/20/secureserver-rejecting-the-otr-digest/</link>
	<description>Ramblings of an Old Man on Old-Time and Contemporary Radio, Television, the Arts, and the News; includes OTR Podcast</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 21:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: tfk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.oldradio.net/archives/2009/06/20/secureserver-rejecting-the-otr-digest/#comment-7950</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.oldradio.net/archives/2009/06/20/secureserver-rejecting-the-otr-digest/#comment-7950</guid>
					<description>You don't suppose they bought McAfool's spam content dictionary, do you? Remember,
I had a problem with any word beginning with "lust". In order to diagnose it, I had
to send myself copies of the digest with posts removed until it made it through. I
don't know that secureservers would be that simple, though, and might decide that
extra copies used for testing were considered bulk &#38; commercial.

I haven't seen a "content filter" work very well yet.

-- Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t suppose they bought McAfool&#8217;s spam content dictionary, do you? Remember,<br />
I had a problem with any word beginning with &#8220;lust&#8221;. In order to diagnose it, I had<br />
to send myself copies of the digest with posts removed until it made it through. I<br />
don&#8217;t know that secureservers would be that simple, though, and might decide that<br />
extra copies used for testing were considered bulk &amp; commercial.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen a &#8220;content filter&#8221; work very well yet.</p>
<p>&#8211; Tom
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

